Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ballew

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 7, 1921No. A-2767PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBessey, J.

The petitioner, Bud Ballew, says he is illegally restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of Carter county, Okla., pursuant to an order or judgment of the district judge •of said county, for an alleged direct criminal contempt of court, by assaulting the person of W. F. Freeman, district judge, on May 20, 1916, on a public street in the city of Ardmore. Portions of the record tend to show that this assault was provoked by and grew out of certain remarks made by the district judge in the course of a proceeding to inquire into any violations of the prohibitory laws, under section 3611, R. L.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RowlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Burfenning v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Ex Parte GudenogeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. State Ex Rel. Miller v. HuserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Ex Parte OwensCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Allen v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Best v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Seay v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API