Legal Opinion

Heinlen v. Martin

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1881No. 6,995PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Twentieth District Court, County of Santa Clara. Belden, J. A petition for rehearing was filed and denied.

1Opinion of the Court

McKee, J.:

This case arises out of an action for the specific performance of a contract for the conveyance of a tract of land, and for the recovery of the rents and profits of the same.

By a decree in the action, rendered January 23d, 1873, the plaintiff was adjudged entitled to a conveyance from the defendants of the interests of certain heirs, under whom he claimed title, and to the rents and profits of the land from *182November 27th, 1868; but from the decree and from an order denying their motion for a new trial the defendants appealed to the late Supreme Court, where, at the hearing of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phelan v. City & County of San FrancisoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Keller v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Hall v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Lial v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Phillips v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API