Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Indiana State Election Board
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided May 22, 1992No. IP 91-898-CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
McKINNEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a motion to dismiss filed, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by the two intervening defendants in this case: the Judicial Nominating Commission for the Superior Court of Lake County (the “Commission intervenors”) and the group of judges currently sitting on that court (the “judicial intervenors”). These intervenors (collectively, the “defendants”) have raised difficult issues under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, including one that apparently is of first impression. Their…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bradley v. WorkDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996
- African-American Voting Rights Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. State of Mo.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
- Prewitt v. MooreDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1993
- African-American Citizens for Change v. RobbinsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993
- African-American Citizens for Change v. St. Louis Board of Police CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.