State v. Para
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was found guilty of seven counts of receiving stolen property (A.R.S. § 13-621). In this appeal, he argues that the trial court committed several errors in the course of his jury trial. Since we hold that the jury instructions in this case require a reversal of appellant’s conviction, we have no need to consider appellant’s other assertions of error.
The evidence most favorable to the judgment is as follows: In October or November of 1974, Mr. Robert McCormick noticed approximately 12 stray horses on his ranch in Maricopa County. He called the Livestock…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. PulliamArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. BrockArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. TatumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- State v. VitaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Leon v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Pote v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. LaughterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- State v. AlbeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.