Legal Opinion

State v. Para

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 25, 1978No. 1 CA-CR 2165, 1 CA-CR 2483PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was found guilty of seven counts of receiving stolen property (A.R.S. § 13-621). In this appeal, he argues that the trial court committed several errors in the course of his jury trial. Since we hold that the jury instructions in this case require a reversal of appellant’s conviction, we have no need to consider appellant’s other assertions of error.

The evidence most favorable to the judgment is as follows: In October or November of 1974, Mr. Robert McCormick noticed approximately 12 stray horses on his ranch in Maricopa County. He called the Livestock…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. PulliamArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State v. BrockArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. People v. TatumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. State v. VitaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Leon v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Pote v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. LaughterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. State v. AlbeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API