Legal Opinion
State v. Flores
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 19, 1984No. 2 CA-CR 2845, 2 CA-CR 3165-2PRPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIRDSALL, Chief Judge.
The appellant was convicted of kidnapping and aggravated assault. Both crimes were held to be of a dangerous nature since the jury found they involved the use of a dangerous instrument.' The jury found the appellant not guilty of armed robbery. The court found the following aggravating circumstances: 1) the threat of infliction of serious physical injury, 2) the use of a dangerous instrument, 3) four prior felony convictions, and 4) the fact that the defendant was on probation at the time he committed the crimes. He was given the maximum aggravated sentence in the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hutto v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Quentin Ira LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Himmelfarb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- State v. PulliamArizona Supreme Court · 1960
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. ReffittArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- William Lyle Woratzeck v. James R. Ricketts, and Donald WawrzaszekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- State v. DetrichArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. TschilarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. LucasArizona Supreme Court · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.