Legal Opinion
State v. Vitale
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 7, 1975No. 2 CA-CR 394PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUCKER, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of attempting to receive stolen property pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 13-108, 13-110, 13-621 and 13-1645, as amended. He was initially arrested on a charge of receiving stolen property, but this charge was subsequently dismissed. Following a plea of not guilty, appellant made, motions at a February 20, 1974 hearing to suppress evidence, to establish entrapment as a matter of law and to dismiss the charge of attempt based on the allegation that the substantive crime was impossible. The motions were denied and appellant was thereafter convicted and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. HagemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Mejak v. GranvilleArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Darnell v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1976
- Ex Parte WallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- State v. GutmanCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.