WÄRTSILÄ NSD NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. Hill International, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RODRIGUEZ, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Hill International, Inc.’s (“Hill”) Motion to Mold the Verdict and Enter Judgment Consistent with the Parties’ Written Contract [Docket No. 258]. This case presents the Court with a unique factual scenario wherein if it accepts Defendant’s arguments, Defendant would have no obligations under the very contract it seeks to enforce. For the reasons expressed herein, the motion will be denied.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The background facts of this case are well known to this Court and the parties…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- William N. Clark v. Modern Group Ltd. John F. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- COLOMIRIS v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- United States Telegraph Co. v. GildersleveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Roanoke Hospital Ass'n v. Doyle & Russell, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Adloo v. H.T. Brown Real Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wartsila NSD North America, Inc. v. Hill International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Wartsila NSD NA Inc v. Hill Intl IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008