Legal Opinion
Brevik v. Kite Painting, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 11, 1987No. CX-86-1878PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Minnesota Court of Appeals which reversed a lower court’s order granting summary judgment for defendant Kite Painting, Inc. Plaintiff employees sued Kite, alleging that they were discharged from employment in retaliation for exercising statutory rights under the Minnesota Occupational Safety and Health Act (MOSHA). Minn.Stat. eh. 182 (1984). The district court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Minn.Stat. § 182.669 (1984) did not authorize a private cause of action for retaliatory discharge. We affirm the court…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Collins v. Elkay Mining Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- McDaniel v. United Hardware Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Reed v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Byrd v. Voca Corp. of Washington, DCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- City of Rochester v. People's Cooperative Power Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.