Legal Opinion

Reed v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1989No. S-2901PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATTHEWS, Chief Justice.

INTRODUCTION

The Municipality of Anchorage (Municipality) fired George C. Reed in retaliation for complaining to the state and the Mayor of Anchorage about allegedly unsafe working conditions. This appeal raises the issue of whether the remedies for retaliatory discharge under the state “whistle blowing” statute, AS 18.60.089, are exclusive. We hold that they are not.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS 1

Reed began working for the Municipality at the Anchorage Wastewater Treatment Plant on Augúst 24, 1981. On or about March 1, 1982, he filed a job safety and health complaint with the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mitford v. De LasalaAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Taylor v. Brighton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  3. Knight v. American Guard & Alert, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Linck v. Barokas & Martin, R.R.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Lepore v. National Tool & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wholey v. RoebuckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. French v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Weidler v. Big J Enterprises, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Norcon, Inc. v. KotowskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API