Legal Opinion
Beck v. Wilson
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 14, 1920No. Civ. No. 3354PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
By a complaint in the usual form in such actions, plaintiff sued to quiet title to certain lots of real estate. The answer denied the allegations of the complaint and alleged that title was vested in defendants, who, as against plaintiff, prayed for a decree quieting the same.
Judgment went for defendants as prayed for, from which plaintiff appeals.
Defendants, in whom title to the property was at the time vested, failed to pay the taxes thereon for the fiscal year of 1912; whereupon the property was sold to the state. Thereafter proceedings were had and taken which, on the eighth day of July,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Moyer v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Warden v. BroomeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Klumpke v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- District Bond Co. v. PollackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Newcomb v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Knoke v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Sawyer v. Berkeley Securities Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Jones v. SturzenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.