Blood v. Munn
California Supreme Court
APPEAL by plaintiff from part of a, judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and appeal by defendants from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial. Chas. Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Two appeals are here presented, one by the plaintiff from part of the judgment, the other by the defendants from an order denying their motion for a new trial. We will first consider the appeal from the order.
The action is to foreclose a mortgage, executed by the defendants Alice F. Munn and O. B. Munn, her husband, to the Union Savings Bank, to secure payment of their note for twenty-two hundred and fifty dollars. The bank assigned the note and mortgage to the plaintiff, after maturity, shortly before the beginning of the action and after the occurrence of the transactions which gave rise to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McArthur v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- State v. GavleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Wilson v. . PattonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Horton v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Bank of Woodland v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Frances Duchek and Arthur Duchek v. Rudolph Jacobi and Elfi JacobiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Humboldt Sav. Bank v. McClevertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Mounce v. WightmanArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Thomas v. SpeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.