Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Speck

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1941No. Civ. 13299PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ITANSON, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judg ment quieting title to real property in favor of the grantee of a homestead declarant against appellants, judgment creditors of the declarant. The judgment was of record prior to the conveyance to respondents.

The facts as stipulated, so far as they are material, are these: In 1930 one De Le Fond recorded a declaration of homestead endorsed upon which the notary’s certificate here in question read as follows: “ . . . personally appeared Charles Be Be Fond, known to me (or proved to me on the oath of himself) to be the person ...” This is the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lubbock v. McMannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Baker v. WoodwardOregon Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Joost v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Sanders v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Reid v. Englehart-Davidson Mercantile Co.California Supreme Court · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. RivesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Engelman v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Krause v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Swearingen v. ByrneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. SBAM PARTNERS, LLC v. Cheng Miin WangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API