Legal Opinion

Mounce v. Wightman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1926No. Civil No. 2446PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— Henry Monnce and Edith E. Monnce, his wife, hereinafter called defendants, were the owners of certain real estate in Graham and Gila comities, Arizona, and a number of cattle running on the open range in the same counties. This property was subject to various encumbrances, which were, in their order; First, a mortgage on the cattle alone in favor of the First National Bank of Globe for approximately $2,600; second, a mortgage for about $1,700 on both the cattle and the land involved in this case to one J. W. Rais; and, third, a chattel mortgage on the cattle to Eliza J. Wightman,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nolan v. NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. White v. FulghumTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Rozek v. RedzinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Wuicich v. Solomon-Wickersham Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1916
  5. In re BaileyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Seppala & Aho Construction Co. v. PetersenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. J. H. Morris, Inc. v. Indian Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. In Re MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Sims v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. Seaney v. MollingArizona Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API