Holmgren Ex Rel. Holmgren v. Heisick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
These appeals in two actions arising out of the same automobile accident were consolidated for hearing and decision in this court.
In the first action, involving personal injury claims brought on behalf of Winton Holmgren, defendant Edmund Heisick, individually, and as special administrator of the estate of Allan Heisick, appeals from the denial of his post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.. The basic issue raised on this appeal is whether the negligence of one of the drivers, David Schmit, was willful and wanton.
In the second action,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mannheimer Bros. v. Kansas Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Caldwell v. Piggly Wiggly Madison Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Eicher v. Universal UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Muggenburg Ex Rel. Muggenburg v. LeightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Specialized Tours, Inc. v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Faber v. RoelofsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Gould v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Faber v. RoelofsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- In re the Estate of SjervenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985