Central States Electric Co. v. City of Muscatine
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
We are concerned in this case with the nature and extent of the powers of a federal court sitting to review an order of the Federal Power Commission.
The decision of the court below denied the petitioner’s application for payment to it of a fund of some $25,000 deposited in court, and directed its payment to persons not privies to the transaction which created the fund. A detailed recitation of events is required to show how the question arises.
The Federal Power Commission (hereinafter called Commission), proceeding under the Natural Gas Act,1 entered an order against the Natural Gas Pipeline…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Public Util. Comm'n of Ohio v. United Fuel Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-Taenzer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Haywood v. BarnesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Federal Power Commission v. Interstate Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Straube v. Bowling Green Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Lightfoot v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Atlantic City Electric Company v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.