Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 16, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*764Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 30, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a router sorting packages and boxes and also had a delivery route, at the conclusion of which he was required to return to the warehouse to punch out his time card. The employer had a policy against employees calling in to have other employees punch out their time cards. Claimant had violated this policy in the past and was warned in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ChilliousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of SotoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. In re the Claim of LaphamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of PesantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API