George v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SIDNEY I. SCHENKIER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs, individually and as representatives of a putative class, have filed this action *341alleging violations of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, (“ERISA”) 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiffs now seek class certification, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a) and (b)(l)-(3) (doc. #81). For the reasons discussed below, the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification is granted and a class certified under Rule 23(b)(1) and (b)(2); plaintiffs’ motion for certification pursuant to…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re Schering Plough Corp. Erisa LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Kanawi v. Bechtel Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Jones v. NovaStar Financial, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2009
- Stanford v. Foamex L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Driver v. AppleIllinois, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.