Legal Opinion

Burns v. Gonzalez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 12, 1969No. 14658PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADENA, Justice.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled. However, the following is substituted for the opinion heretofore filed herein.

Plaintiff, William G. Burns, sued Arturo C. Gonzalez and Ramon D. Bosquez, individually and as sole partners in Inter-American Advertising Agency (herein called “the partnership”), to recover on a $40,000.00 promissory note executed by Bosquez in his own name and in the name of the partnership. After an interlocutory default judgment had been entered in favor of plaintiff against Bosquez, the trial court, sitting without a jury, entered the judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Randall, Sawyer & Dyer v. Merideth & AilmanTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Collins & Douglas v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Brewer v. Big Lake State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Cassidy Commission Company v. Security State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Gonzalez v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cook v. Brundidge, Fountain, Elliott & ChurchillTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Boyd v. Leasing Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Grosberg v. Michigan National Bank OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  4. QAD Investors, Inc. v. KellySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. Womack v. First National Bank of San AugustineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API