Legal Opinion

Grosberg v. Michigan National Bank Oakland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1985No. 69031, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

This appeal involves an unusual admixture of partnership law in a case otherwise governed by Uniform Commercial Code principles. Although both courts below absolved defendant Michigan National Bank-Oakland of any liability to plaintiff Merwin K. Grosberg for conversion, the trial court reached its decision relying heavily on partnership principles, while the Court of Appeals focused instead on the commercial reasonableness of the bank’s conduct under the UCC. We find the partnership aspects to be controlling in this case and so affirm on that ground.

I

As developed below, plaintiff Grosberg…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. v. Hepler State BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  3. Taylor v. Equitable Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Bank of Southern Maryland v. Robertson's Crab House, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Womack MacHine Supply Co. of Houston v. Fannin BankTexas Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Capital Dredge and Dock Corporation, an Ohio Corporation v. City of Detroit, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. Willey v. MayerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. Kelly v. Central Bank & Trust Co. of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Delta Chemical and Petroleum, Inc. v. Citizens Bank of ByhaliaCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API