Legal Opinion
QAD Investors, Inc. v. Kelly
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided July 20, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.
[¶ 1] Laurence Kelly appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Wamn, J.) in favor of QAD Investors, Inc. on its claim against Kelly for failure to fulfill his obligations pursuant to a promissory note. Kelly contends that the court erred in finding him liable on a note that he did not sign, and was not signed or ratified on behalf of himself or the partnership he formed with Stephen MacKenzie; in awarding attorney fees to QAD pursuant to the note; and in awarding attorney fees in excess of QAD’s costs of collection. We disagree and affirm.
BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] The court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Forrest Associates v. Passamaquoddy TribeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Acadia Insurance Co. v. Buck Construction Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Poussard v. Commercial Credit Plan, Incorporated of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Barnes v. McLendonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Luddington v. Bodenvest Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Phillips v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Fitzgerald v. HutchinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Gniadek v. Camp Sunshine at Sebago Lake, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Yim K. Cheung v. Wing Ki WuSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- Estate of Barbara M. FrostSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.