Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Leasing Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 7, 1974No. 16306PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Chief Justice.

This is a suit to recover the balance due under an automobile lease agreement secured by a continuing guaranty agreement. A judgment was entered for the plaintiff after a trial to the court without a jury. No findings of fact or conclusions of law were filed.

N. A. Boyd and H. Nordstrom entered into the restaurant business under the name “Nasa Grill” as a partnership venture. On January 19, 1966 “Nasa Grill, a Partnership” leased a 1966 station wagon from Leasing Associates, Inc. and in connection therewith entered into a written lease agreement which was executed for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chastain v. Cooper & ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Howell v. BowdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Shahan-Taylor Co. v. Foremost Dairies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Lloyds Casualty Insurer v. FarrarTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Wewerka v. LantronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Adams v. Petrade International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  2. Polland & Cook v. Lehmann, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  3. Woodruff v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Longoria v. Atlantic Gulf Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. First Western Bank v. Livestock Yards Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API