Legal Opinion

Meyer v. McAllister

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 1914No. Civ. No. 1408PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Franklin J. Cole, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

In this action plaintiff seeks to recover damages in the sum of $1,345 incurred by defendant’s breach of a contract made with plaintiff’s assignor, wherein the defendant agreed to purchase from the vendor certain machinery at the agreed price of $2,145. Judgment was awarded in the sum of $429, and the plaintiff appeals from the judgment, as well as from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

As both parties assume, in accordance with the record, that there was a contract and that there was a breach thereof by the defendant, the only questions presented on appeal relate to the plaintiff’s…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sackett v. SpindlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Katzenbach & Bullock Co. v. BreslauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Tatone v. Chin BingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Western Industries Co. v. Mason Malt Whiskey Distilling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API