Tatone v. Chin Bing
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages for injury to personal property. An automobile of defendant Bing struck a truck of plaintiff! loaded with fruit and vegetables which were destroyed in tfye accident. The trial court allowed plaintiff damages in the sum of $150 for the loss of the fruit and vegetables. The correctness of the award of this item of damage is the sole question presented on this appeal.
The agent of plaintiff had purchased the fruit and vegetables at a cost of $150, at a wholesale market in Fresno early on the morning of the accident. He was proceeding to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jones v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co. v. Southern Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- San Diego Water Co. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Moore v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Angell v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Shook v. BealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Shook v. BealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Watterson v. KnappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Stroman v. LynchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.