United States v. Staruska
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
EARLY, Chief Judge:
Tried by special court-martial, the accused was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of stealing 300 Deutsche Marks, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 921. The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three months and reduction to airman basic.
Appellate defense counsel assign one error for our consideration:
The Military Judge erred to the substantial prejudice of the-accused by improperly instructing the Court on how to reconsider a sentence.
We disagree.
At trial, after the members were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. DonohewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. CraigUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. RobinsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. SilvaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. MayfieldNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. MoreroNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994