Legal Opinion

Powell v. Big Horn Low Line Ditch Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1928No. 6,227PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

This is an action to quiet title. The complaint followed the usual form used in such actions and alleged that plaintiff was, and for a long time had been, the owner of the south half of the northeast quarter of section 28, township 1 north, range 33 east, M. P. M!; that the defendant, a Montana corporation, claimed an interest therein adverse to plaintiff, but that said claim was without any right whatever; and prayed that the defendant be required to set forth the nature of its claim and that it be adjudged groundless.

The defendant’s answer put in issue the plaintiff’s ownership of the land…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blackman v. . StrikerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Biles v. Tacoma, Olympia & Gray's Harbor RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Herbert v. PueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  4. Mannix v. Powell CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Moore v. LordMississippi Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hartman v. PotterUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Marias River Syndicate v. Big West Oil Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hughes v. KingMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  4. City of Missoula v. MixMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. City of Missoula v. MixMontana Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API