Legal Opinion

Biles v. Tacoma, Olympia & Gray's Harbor Railroad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1893No. 602PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Court, Chehalis County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, J.

On May 11, 1876, the Northern Pacific Bailroad Company, then being the owner of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of section 1, in township No. 17, north, of range 6, west of the Willamette meridian, *510conveyed the same to the respondent by a warranty deed containing the following clause:

“Reserving and excepting therefrom, however, a strip of land extending through the sátne (or so much of such strip as may be within said described premises), of the width of four hundred feet, that is, two hundred feet on each side of the center…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barlow v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  2. Stockwell v. CouillardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  3. Inhabitants of Winthrop v. FairbanksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1856
  4. In re MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Carlson v. Duluth Short Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Uhl v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Harris v. Ski Park Farms, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Morsbach v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Barrett v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  5. Moakley v. Los Angeles Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API