Legal Opinion

Herbert v. Pue

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 18, 1890PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Howard County. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. The verdict and judgment were in favor of the plaintiff for one cent damages and costs. The defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.

The plaintiff in this case, who is now appellee, sued the appellant in tresjiass, alleging that, as a son of Arthur Pue, he was entitled, for himself and his descendants, by virtue of a certain deed from his father, Arthur Pue, to one James Mackubin, to the use of a certain grave-yard upon a farm known as “Gray Rock,” for the customary uses of a grave-yard; and that two of the plaintiff’s children rested there ; and that the appellant had removed the fence around the grave-yard, and plowed the yard and sowed it in grass, and had removed beautiful shade trees, and obliterated and destroyed the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schaidt v. BlaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Western Maryland RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  2. Calvert Joint Venture 140 v. SniderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Stone v. StoneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Deaver v. AaronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  5. Legout v. PriceIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API