Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Richards

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Oren R. Richards, a member of the Oregon State Bar, is charged with entering into a contingent fee contract resulting in a fee to him so exorbitant and disproportionate to the services performed as to shock the conscience and merit disciplinary action.

A brief statement of the facts reveals that Richards made this contract with one Francis A. Raymond, a person then 84 years of age, of low-grade education and whose work had been at various lands of common labor. Under the agreement as drawn Richards was to receive one half the value of the statutory homestead then part of the modest estate of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goldstone v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re GastineauOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re QuinnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. In Re PottsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. In Re Little and KingOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  5. In re Complaint as to the Conduct of LittleOregon Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API