Legal Opinion

In Re Little and King

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

247 Or. 503 (1967)

431 P.2d 284

IN RE COMPLAINT AS TO THE CONDUCT OF CARL M. LITTLE AND STEPHEN M. KING, ACCUSED.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued April 3, 1967.

September 7, 1967.

Gunther F. Krause, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for Carl M. Little, Accused.

William M. Dale and Thomas H. Tongue, Portland, argued the cause and filed briefs for Stephen M. King, Accused.

John J. Higgins, Portland, argued the cause for Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief was Stuart W. Gates.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and McALLISTER, SLOAN, GOODWIN, LUSK and FORT,[*] Justices.

Little suspended for one…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goldstone v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. In Re IrwinOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  4. In re Complaint as to the Conduct of LittleOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API