Legal Opinion

Fanning v. Iversen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1995No. 18905PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

N. Ruth Iversen (Iversen) appeals the trial court’s judgment granting title to real estate and awarding money to Dick Fanning (Fan ning). We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

FACTS

Fanning is a rancher who lives near Long Valley, South Dakota. He has a high school education and some vocational training. Iv-ersen is a resident from Wall, South Dakota, who had completed her first year of law school at the University of South Dakota at time of trial.

The parties met at a football game in Wall during September, 1988. At this time, Iver-sen was employed as a teacher in the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Isaac v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City of Sioux Falls v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Senger v. SengerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Cordell v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. FowlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Cleveland v. TinagliaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Albinger v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Kieser v. Southeast PropertiesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API