Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Curley

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 26, 1934PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The present proceeding, initiated by a widow under section 145-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act for a determination of her rights to elect against the provisions of the will of her late husband, presents a number of novel questions respecting this recently acquired right of a surviving spouse. Testator was survived by the widow but by no children or parent, so that if he had died intestate, her distributive rights in the estate would have been $10,000 plus one-half. (Dec. Est. Law, § 83, subd. 4.)

The will, which in some respects is a rather remarkable document, is dated May 1, 1933,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. United States v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Bertles v. . NunanNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Alexandrine Mager v. Felix GrimaSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  5. Matter of ByrnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BommerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. In re the Estate of CurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of CurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  4. In re the Estate of BrownNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  5. In re the Estate of ClarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API