Legal Opinion
Estate of Weber
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 8, 1991No. G009776PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SONENSHINE, J.
Jack K. Weber appeals the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend his opposition to probate of his mother’s will. (Prob. Code, § 8250.) He contends he has standing as an interested person, despite the trial court’s finding the result would be the same whether he is a beneficiary pursuant to the will or receives his share pursuant to intestacy.
I
The decedent, Sonya Weber, was the mother of both Jack Weber and Ruth Hollis. Sonya left a will dated July 22, 1982, and a codicil dated July 20, 1988. Except for a few token bequests, the will and codicil divided Sonya’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- DeGrandchamp v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Winter v. RiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Glassgold v. GlassgoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Estate of StierlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Estate of MarlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- H. D. Arnaiz Ltd. v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Doran v. MaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Merritt v. DitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Calhoun v. Vallejo City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Wells Properties v. PopkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.