Wells Properties v. Popkin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Richard Popkin, Ruth Shamir and Jack Golan (Popkin) appeal from an order denying their motion to impose sanctions as prescribed by Code of Civil Procedure section 128.51 against Wells Properties and its attorneys, Schmiesing Blied (Wells).
FACTS
Popkin and Wells settled an action seeking an unpaid real estate commission. Under the terms of the agreement, Popkin would pay Wells $25,000 at a rate of $5,000 per month. Popkin also signed a stipulation for entry of judgment for $55,000. If any payment was late, Wells, at their sole discretion, had the right to declare a default and enter the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- DeGrandchamp v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Estate of WeberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Greene v. AmanteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
3Cited by15 opinions
- H. D. Arnaiz Ltd. v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Doran v. MaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Muller v. Fresno Community Hospital & Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Shelton v. Rancho Mortgage & Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Katzenstein v. Chabad of PowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.