Legal Opinion

State v. Cornell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1981No. 8024SC828PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant first contends the trial court erred “in denying [his] motion to dismiss for failure to provide a speedy trial.” A defendant in a criminal case has the burden of proof in supporting a motion to dismiss for failure to comply with the time limits for commencement of trial imposed by G.S. 15A-701. G.S. 15A-703 (1978). The State, however, has “the burden of going forward with evidence in connection with excluding periods from computation of time” in determining whether the applicable time limitations have been complied with. Id.

The defendant here presented, at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. KeeterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API