Legal Opinion

State v. Perry

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1981No. 808SC1038PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant’s first assignment of error relates to the denial of his motion for a mistrial. During cross-examination the witness Woodrow Williams testified, without objection: “As to whether anybody has ever threatened me with prosecution in this case, I have been threatened today. As to whether anybody ever threatened to bring charges against me for receiving stolen property, no they have not.” The district attorney subsequently asked Williams on redirect: “Mr. Williams, you stated on cross examination you had been threatened?” The witness answered: “I have.” Defense counsel’s…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. GilleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API