State v. Hall
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
The defendant’s first assignment of error is to the court’s acceptance of a verdict of guilty to felonious larceny. The State agrees with the defendant that this assignment of error has merit. In this case the court in its charge did not instruct the jury to fix the value of the property but told them to find the defendant guilty of felonious larceny if they were satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the property was taken during the burglary or after a breaking or entering. The defendant was found not guilty of the burglary and breaking or entering. The jury could not find him…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. . RaperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. KeeterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. CornellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. SkipperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. MacOnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. ShulerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.