Thigpen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
1. The contracting parties in group insurance are primarily the employer and the insurer. Curd v. Travelers Insurance Co., 51 Ga. App. 306, 310 (180 S. E. 249); Johnson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 52 Ga. App. 759, 763 (3) (184 S. E. 392). “The certificate to the employee is an evidence of his coverage by the master policy. . . The line dividing the three parties to the contract, the employer, employees, and the insurance company, according to their interest and real position in these transactions, puts the employer with the employee as opposed to the insurance company.” Lancaster v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boseman v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Lancaster v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Johnson v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Curd v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dawes Mining Co. v. CallahanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Cason v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Blaylock v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Clements v. Continental Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1989
- Porter v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.