Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Fitz Simons & Connell Dredge & Dock Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 26, 1951No. 10322PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.

On October 10, 1947, plaintiff, a seaman on the Great Lakes, filed his complaint under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, for personal injuries sustained by him on September 29, 1947, while working as a deckhand on the tug boat Roche, of which defendant was the owner. It contained three counts. Count one charged defendant’s negligence and the unseaworthiness of the tug caused plaintiff’s injuries; counts two and three asked for cure and maintenance, respectively. At the outset of the trial, plaintiff elected to proceed on the charge of negligence alleged under the Jones…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. De Zon v. American President Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Jordine v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Karl Weiss, Jr. v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Jenkins v. RoderickDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1957
  3. Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Hill v. United Fruit CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1957
  5. Repsholdt v. United States (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API