Legal Opinion

Archibald v. Act III Arabians

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1988No. C-7140PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEARS, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether there is an implied warranty of good and workmanlike performance that applies to horse training services. Petitioner John Archibald placed an Arabian mare in the training program offered by respondent Act III Arabians. While under the care of Act III Arabians, the mare was injured and eventually had to be destroyed. Archibald sued Act III Arabians, alleging negligence, gross negligence, and violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA). Tex.Bus. & Comm.Code Ann. § 17.41 et seq. (Vernon 1987). The jury answered all issues on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Melody Home Manufacturing Co. v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Trunkline LNG Co. v. Trane Thermal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Webb v. Finger Contract Supply CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Texas Imports v. Allday, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1983
  5. Archibald v. Act III ArabiansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Arthur's Garage, Inc. v. Racal-Chubb Security Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
  3. Wisenbarger v. Gonzales Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
  4. LaBella v. Charlie Thomas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1997
  5. Eoff v. Hal & Charlie Peterson Foundation, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API