Legal Opinion

Eoff v. Hal & Charlie Peterson Foundation

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided May 15, 1991No. 04-89-00417-CVPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REEVES, Chief Justice.

This appeal considers the liability of a hospital for alleged acts of negligence, violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA), 1 and the alleged negligence of a physician working in the hospital’s emergency room. Appellants/Plaintiffs are Mrs. Marjorie Sue Eoff and her husband, Milton W. Eoff. Appellee/Defen-dant is the Hal and Charlie Peterson Foun dation, d/b/a Sid Peterson Hospital (the hospital).

The hospital was awarded a partial summary judgment in which the trial court found that the DTPA did not, as a matter of law, apply to this case.

A jury…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Melody Home Manufacturing Co. v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Southern Pine Lumber Co. v. AndradeTexas Supreme Court · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Duran v. Furr's Supermarkets, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
  2. Knoll v. Neblett, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. Berry Property Management, Inc. v. Bliskey, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  4. Crum & Forster, Inc. v. Monsanto Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1994
  5. Omega Contracting, Inc. v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API