State v. Masloski
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Petitioner Masloski is a defendant in a DWI prosecution who seeks discretionary review of a pretrial order denying his motion to dismiss. Masloski’s motion raised the issue whether he was in “physical control” of the vehicle.
The state and Masloski stipulated to the facts for purposes of deciding the motion to dismiss. They stipulated Masloski had not been driving before the vehicle reached the ditch, and that the car was immobilized. They also stipulated to the facts in the police report to the extent they were not inconsistent, including…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. HeremSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Costillo v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. DuemkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Of Iowa Vs. Jordan Heath DentlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007