State v. Herem
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
Defendant Paul Luther Herem was convicted of fleeing an officer, driving while under the influence of alcohol, and careless driving. After denial of his motion for acquittal or a new trial, defendant appealed, claiming the trial court had erred in declining to suppress statements made to a police officer at the scene of a traffic stop. The court of appeals found that the questioning amounted to a custodial interrogation, necessitating a Miranda warning, and reversed and remanded for a new trial. We reverse and reinstate the judgment of conviction.
Shortly before midnight on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. MoffattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. GesingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.