Legal Opinion
State v. Duemke
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 19, 1984No. C5-83-1921PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for driving, operating, or being in physical control of a vehicle, a gross misdemeanor due to occurrence of the offense before reinstatement of a revoked drivers license, Minn.Stat. § 169.129. He contends that evidence was insufficient to show his physical control of the vehicle, or to show his driving or operating the vehicle. He also claims the trial court committed reversible error in its instructions on the elements of the offense, and in omitting an instruction on the use of impeachment evidence.
The state contends that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. Alexander GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- State v. HeinkelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. ThreinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- State v. StarfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Hughes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.