Barney v. Magenis
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDe Courcy, J.
The plaintiff has a verdict in an action brought *271to recover damages for the conscious suffering and death of her intestate, Dr. Willis O. Barney. It is admitted in the defendant’s bill of exceptions that there was evidence of the intestate’s due care, and (independently of any evidence excepted to) that his injury and death were due to the negligence of Herbert H. Shuman in operating an automobile owned by the defendant.
1. It is argued that the motion for a directed verdict should have been granted, on the ground that the evidence did not warrant a finding that Shuman was engaged in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sullivan v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Eldridge v. BartonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Reynolds v. DenholmMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Slotofski v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Donahue v. VorenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Anderson v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
- McDonough v. VozzelaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Thomes v. Meyer Store Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. QuickMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.