Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Denholm

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 25, 1913PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for injuries caused by a collision of the defendant’s automobile with the team driven by the plaintiff. The accident occurred August 7, 1910. At the dose of the evidence the presiding judge * directed a verdict for the defendant, and the case is here on exceptions by the plaintiff to that ruling. *577The question is whether the evidence warranted a finding that what the driver of the machine was doing at the time of the accident came within the scope of his employment. The case is a close one and seems to have been tried with a hesitating touch on both sides.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. McCarthy v. TimminsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Fleischner v. DurginMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Pigeon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Anderson v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Wilson v. EdwardsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. McDonough v. VozzelaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Thomes v. Meyer Store Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API