Legal Opinion
Wiederhorn v. Sands, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 1, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
This is a motion, pursuant to Rule 12 (b) (2), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C., to vacate service of process upon this defendant on the ground that defendant, a Nevada corporation, is not doing business in this state and therefore not amenable to process here.
Plaintiff is a New York resident who alleges that she was injured while a guest at defendant’s hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada. Defendant is not authorized to do business in New York but is listed in the New York telephone directory and on its advertisements as having a New York office at 48 West 48th Street, with telephone…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kelley v. DelawareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Lasky v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- Lambert v. SchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Perkins v. Louisville & N. R. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harriett MacInnes and Malcolm D. MacInnes Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp., Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Bertha Jennings v. McCall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Nash-Ringel, Inc. v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Federazione Italiana Dei Consorzi Agrari v. Mandask Compania De Vapores, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Sawyer v. Soaring Society of America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.