Legal Opinion

State v. Parkinson

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 12, 2018No. 20160237-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORME, Judge:

¶ 1 Defendant Michael Roy Parkinson appeals his convictions for assault against a police officer and failing to respond to an officer's command to stop. Defendant argues that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by proposing erroneous jury instructions. Because Defendant has not demonstrated that any such errors were prejudicial, we affirm his convictions.

¶ 2 Two Murray City detectives, driving in unmarked police vehicles, initiated a traffic stop after Defendant followed the car in front of him too closely and failed to use his turn signal for at least two seconds…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Weaver v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PadillaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  2. State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  3. State v. WhitbeckCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  4. State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API