Legal Opinion

State v. Padilla

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 14, 2018No. 20160305-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

Judge Jill M. Pohlman authored this Opinion, in which Judges David N. Mortensen and Diana Hagen concurred.

1Opinion of the Court

POHLMAN, Judge:

¶1 Ricardo Antonio Padilla appeals his convictions for felony discharge of a firearm and obstruction of justice. He argues that the trial court erred by refusing to give a cautionary instruction to the jury about accomplice testimony. He also argues that he received constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel when his counsel failed to renew a motion for mistrial. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 A jury convicted Padilla of felony discharge of a firearm and obstruction of justice based on his involvement in events that led to the death of a rival gang member (Victim). One evening…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. R.C.S. v. A.O.L.Utah Supreme Court · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  2. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  3. Ho v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. In re Adoption of E.M.F...Court of Appeals of Utah · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API