State v. Padilla
Court of Appeals of Utah
Judge Jill M. Pohlman authored this Opinion, in which Judges David N. Mortensen and Diana Hagen concurred.
1Opinion of the Court
POHLMAN, Judge:
¶1 Ricardo Antonio Padilla appeals his convictions for felony discharge of a firearm and obstruction of justice. He argues that the trial court erred by refusing to give a cautionary instruction to the jury about accomplice testimony. He also argues that he received constitutionally ineffective assistance of counsel when his counsel failed to renew a motion for mistrial. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2 A jury convicted Padilla of felony discharge of a firearm and obstruction of justice based on his involvement in events that led to the death of a rival gang member (Victim). One evening…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- R.C.S. v. A.O.L.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- Ho v. Department of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- In re Adoption of E.M.F...Court of Appeals of Utah · 2022