Legal Opinion

League of Women Voters v. Eu

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 19, 1992No. C013250PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

In this original proceeding, we revisit an area of the law which has become familiar judicial territory, the single-subject rule. Article II, section 8, subdivision (d) of the California Constitution reads: “An initiative measure embracing more than one subject may not be submitted to the electors or have any effect.” Here we consider application of this rule to an initiative measure entitled the Government Accountability and Taxpayer Protection Act of 1992 (hereafter GATPA or the initiative).

The League of Women Voters, Children Now, California Common Cause, California…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Professional Engineers in California Government v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. City of Cerritos v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Mission Housing Development Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. San Miguel Consolidated Fire Protection District v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Senate of the State of Cal. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API