Legal Opinion

Russell E. Adkins, M.D. v. Arthur P. Christie

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 12, 2007No. 06-13107PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, Circuit Judge:

This appeal concerns an evidentiary privilege known as the “medical peer review privilege.” The privilege seeks to protect from discovery and disclosure records containing performance reviews and assessments of physicians by their peers, primarily in connection with their practices at hospitals. The issue before us is whether to recognize the privilege in federal civil rights cases. The Fourth and Seventh Circuits have denied the privilege in these cases. We join them in declining to recognize a privilege for documents relating to medical peer review proceedings in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Florida Hosp. Waterman, Inc. v. BusterSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
  2. Jane Doe v. Roy BlackCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Jennifer Akridge v. ALFA Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  4. Hamdan v. Indiana University Health North Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Kd Ex Rel. Dieffenbach v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API